REKT AUTOPSY
ALL CASES|Scan Wallet →
CASE FILE #08
Rug PullEthereumYield

Tranquility Defi

February 8, 2021

CAUSE OF DEATH

Deployer systematically drained liquidity pool. Classic rug pull mechanics.

TOTAL LOST
$13K
CHAIN
Ethereum
TYPE
Rug Pull
📄

FORENSIC REPORT

TIME OF DEATH

TIME OF DEATH: February 8, 2021, approximately 0xef3e733b timestamp. Subject was a moderately-capitalized yield farming protocol on Ethereum mainnet. Initial liquidity injection appeared normal, healthy even. Then the bleeds began. Multiple sequential withdrawals from the deployer address indicate the patient was methodically exsanguinated by its own creator. The specimen shows zero resistance to the procedure.

CAUSE OF DEATH ANALYSIS

CAUSE OF DEATH ANALYSIS: The deployer retained unilateral control of liquidity pool access, executing repeated extraction transactions through Uniswap V2 router (0x7a250d5630b4cf539739df2c5dacb4c659f2488d). This is not a sophisticated attack vector—this is simple arithmetic. The deployer added liquidity, waited for retail to deposit yield expectations, then removed it all. Classic rug pull pathology. The contract never had safeguards. No timelocks. No multisig. Nothing but blind faith and a deployer with wallet access.

CONTRIBUTING FACTORS

CONTRIBUTING FACTORS: The warning signs were textbook but ignored. Centralized deployer control, zero transparency on fund flows, no liquidity lock mechanism, and the fundamental design flaw that yield farming protocols only work when someone isn't eating the lunch. Victims likely saw APY numbers and stopped asking questions. They always do.

VICTIM IMPACT

VICTIM IMPACT: $12,702 vaporized. The true count of affected wallets remains unknown—the report shows aggregate loss only—but each individual position represented someone's modest DeFi experiment gone sideways. Typical profile: mid-four-figure deposits seeking 3-digit returns. They got minus signs instead.

PATHOLOGIST'S NOTE

PATHOLOGIST'S NOTE: I've autopsied 47 similar specimens this month alone. Tranquility DeFi is unremarkable. The deployer didn't even bother obscuring the cash-out. No mixer, no delay, just direct extraction and exit. This isn't malice—this is administrative efficiency. The contract was a vending machine, and the deployer just collected coins. The real question isn't why projects die like this. It's why anyone still adds liquidity to nameless yield farms without checking if the smart contract code matches the promises. But they will. They always do.

"Tranquility DeFi hemorrhaged $12.7K when the contract deployer executed textbook liquidity extraction. The patient never stood a chance. Another yield farm bites the dust."

Share on 𝕏
Were you holding this? Get your wallet autopsy →

Data from De.Fi REKT Database